One Sided Deals
The spirit of the
deal can be as important as the terms of the contract, even a tightly worded
contract can be sabotaged by either party backing out of the agreement, or by
acting in bad faith. Capable negotiators understand
that the stability of the outcome is important and focus on more than simply
maximizing the concessions that can be extracted from the other side. This is
down to effective negotiation skills; they know
that if either side subsequently has reason to regret or resent the agreement
reached, then they may seek to undermine it, or even reject it outright. Think
about the following scenarios.
Consider a situation where management secure an agreement with workforce representatives on new working practices, but the workforce themselves believe that they have been coerced into acceptance. The workforce might then employ disruptive tactics, for example by refusing to undertake any tasks that are outside their formal job description. The result of this kind of action is often highly disruptive, even though it breaks no agreements or contracts.
In situations where sales representatives secure deals that are very one-sided the buyer may, on reflection, decide that he wishes to back out of it. In the business world it would prove very expensive and time consuming for the seller to seek recourse through the legal system. Furthermore such action would alienate a potentially valuable customer and could result in a lot of negative publicity.
Where the public are involved, and as consumers commit to purchase high value goods and services, they are usually protected by a legally specified cooling-off period. During this period they can back-out of the deal without incurring a penalty. Here the law recognizes that trained sales staff are usually much better deal makers than members of the public.
The Win/Win or
Integrative Approach
There are two types
of negotiation process that differ fundamentally in their approach and in the
relative prospects for the stability of the agreement that is reached. The first
is called the integrative or win/win approach. In these negotiations the
prospects for both side’s gains are encouraging. Both sides attempt to reconcile
their positions so that the end result is an agreement under which both will
benefit - therefore the resultant agreement tends to be stable. Win/win
negotiations are characterized by open and empathetic communications and are
commonly referred to as partnership agreements.
The Win/Lose
or Distributive Approach
The second is
called the distributive or win/lose approach. In these negotiations each of the
parties seeks maximum gains and therefore usually seeks to impose maximum losses
on the other side. This approach often produces agreements which are inherently
unstable, as represented by the triangle balance on its apex.
The Mixed
Approach
In real life
negotiations both of these processes tend to be at work together. Therefore,
rather than two negotiators adopting one or other of the approaches,
negotiations tend to involve a tension between the two. It should be apparent
that where a long term business relationship is involved that it is important to
adopt a more integrative (win/win) approach to negotiations. The failure to work
together with the other side in order to reach a mutually acceptable outcome is
a common reason for the breakdown in many otherwise successful business
relationships.
Stability of
the Outcome
Remember, the
spirit of the deal can be as important as the terms of the contract and when
seeking to expedite negotiations that will deliver a deal that suits the needs
of both sides, you should:
1. Focus
initially on each side’s primary objective - ancillary negotiating points can
become a distraction in the early stages.
2. Be
prepared to settle for what is fair - if an agreement is not seen to be
equitable it is unlikely to be stable. Maintain flexibility in your own demands
and interests, this makes it easier for the other side to be flexible as well.
3. Listen
to what the other side wants and make efforts to meet their requests. You may
need to compromise on the main issues, so that both sides can begin to attain
their goals.
4. Seek
to trade-off concessions - so that each side gets something in return for
everything they give up.
Capable negotiators understand that the stability of the outcome is important and focus on more than simply maximizing the concessions that can be extracted from the other side.
All Material - Copyright Interactive Training Technologies (2000 - 2005). All Rights Reserved.